“Shooting suspects should be considered armed and dangerous”
That’s a simple, right to the point headline, isn’t it?
No, actually.
Whenever I see a headline like that, I can’t help but think no shit. Generally speaking, somebody who is capable of shooting another person is indeed both armed and dangerous. Thanks for the hot tip. I also half expect to read that a new study says that shooters tend to be armed and dangerous, as if we need that.
Cranky guy is kind of being cranky here I know, but if your goal is to warn me about a specific set of shooters, maybe tell me where they were when they started down the road to becoming shooting suspects. That seems somewhat important.